Your payment, most often will be a little higher then if you were to pay closing costs and roll them into the loan. But the amount of time it would take to make the money back through monthly payments would usually be out past around 5 years.
Most people will refinance or sell before the first 5 years is up on the loan. Not to mention if it is a band-aid loan which is intended to boost your credit and then refinance. With this scenario it is definitely the wisest choice to make because you know you are going to refinance again within the next few years... maybe as soon as a few months.
Another reason for doing a zero cost loan would be; that if rates happen to go down in the future, you can refinance again to the initial rate in which you were going to pay for. And it now has cost you nothing. If you recall back in the 80's and 90's when rates were much higher and there was a steady downtrend, some of you may have refinanced over four times and each time paying upwards of $5,000 in closing costs. That's $20,000 total back into your loan. With a Zero Cost Loan your balance would have remained the same. You can always refinance to a lower rate, but its much harder to refinance to a lower balance.
About the only time you would not want to do a zero cost loan would be on some of the larger loan amounts of $600,000 and up. The reason for this is that the interest rate is being applied to a larger sum of money and the break even point becomes only a few years out... it simply savings after that point. You can pay closing costs if you prefer, in fact some scenarios may warrant it. Yet, I'm sure you will see that a Zero Cost Loan is preferred.
Scott Lambertus
http://www.zerocostlender.com/index.htm
Scott@zerocostlender.com
877-302-5546
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Scott_Lambertus
Tags:
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น